<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Put That eSATA Port To Good Use With A Dual-Interface Flash Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rimka</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-392282</link>
		<dc:creator>Rimka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14679#comment-392282</guid>
		<description>If you read the article it states that this isn&#039;t flash memory, it&#039;s a Solid State Drive (SSD), which can reach significantly higher speeds (Samsung just released one that does 200 MB/s). So while this won&#039;t FULLY utilize my poor SATA port it will certainly go much further then a flash drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the article it states that this isn&#39;t flash memory, it&#39;s a Solid State Drive (SSD), which can reach significantly higher speeds (Samsung just released one that does 200 MB/s). So while this won&#39;t FULLY utilize my poor SATA port it will certainly go much further then a flash drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rimka</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-388992</link>
		<dc:creator>Rimka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14679#comment-388992</guid>
		<description>If you read the article it states that this isn&#039;t flash memory, it&#039;s a Solid State Drive (SSD), which can reach significantly higher speeds (Samsung just released one that does 200 MB/s). So while this won&#039;t FULLY utilize my poor SATA port it will certainly go much further then a flash drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the article it states that this isn&#39;t flash memory, it&#39;s a Solid State Drive (SSD), which can reach significantly higher speeds (Samsung just released one that does 200 MB/s). So while this won&#39;t FULLY utilize my poor SATA port it will certainly go much further then a flash drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott_T</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-388989</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott_T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14679#comment-388989</guid>
		<description>Ditto to what skeptic says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to what skeptic says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/10/put-that-esata-port-to-good-use-with-a-dual-interface-flash-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-388960</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14679#comment-388960</guid>
		<description>I call bullshit.  The bottleneck on flash drives is the memory itself, not the USB2.0 throughput.  USB2.0 throughput is 60MB/s.  But you are lucky to find a flash drive that can read at better than 35MB/s.  Using a connection with faster throughput does not improve the speed of the memory chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call bullshit.  The bottleneck on flash drives is the memory itself, not the USB2.0 throughput.  USB2.0 throughput is 60MB/s.  But you are lucky to find a flash drive that can read at better than 35MB/s.  Using a connection with faster throughput does not improve the speed of the memory chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
