<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analog Digital Photo Frame Earns A Double-Take</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ashley - digital frames</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/comment-page-1/#comment-394948</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley - digital frames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14583#comment-394948</guid>
		<description>Do you need to scroll to see the picture?  Otherwise, pretty cool.  thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need to scroll to see the picture?  Otherwise, pretty cool.  thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LukeAnderson</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/comment-page-1/#comment-392660</link>
		<dc:creator>LukeAnderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14583#comment-392660</guid>
		<description>Not true, that just means the window is too small to view the entire image at 100%. Though oddly enough it never seems to cut off any of the picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true, that just means the window is too small to view the entire image at 100%. Though oddly enough it never seems to cut off any of the picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LukeAnderson</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/comment-page-1/#comment-388916</link>
		<dc:creator>LukeAnderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14583#comment-388916</guid>
		<description>Not true, that just means the window is too small to view the entire image at 100%. Though oddly enough it never seems to cut off any of the picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true, that just means the window is too small to view the entire image at 100%. Though oddly enough it never seems to cut off any of the picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iSi</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/comment-page-1/#comment-388914</link>
		<dc:creator>iSi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=14583#comment-388914</guid>
		<description>but theres a mistake - if its 100%, there wouldn´t be any scroll bars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but theres a mistake &#8211; if its 100%, there wouldn´t be any scroll bars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
