Comments on: NeatReceipts NeatDesk Scanner

By: jhon4512

jhon4512 — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 01:24:14 +0000

First let me start off with the truth stretching. The scanner is very fast while scanning in B/W images but it did not seam like it was 25 PPM fast so I timed it using a stop watch. I was able to scan in a page (two sides) in 6.4 seconds that's 10 PPM not 25! As Fujitsu rates their ScanSnap S1500M at 20 PPM whether you scan one or two sides, I assumed I would see the NeatDesk scanner do the same. Thinking that they (NeatCo) must have been playing with some slick marketing numbers when they came up with the 25 PPM rate I figured I would see the 10 PPM rate double to 20 if I only scanned one side of a page instead of two. I was very disappointed to see that the rate did not change between one or two sides. Normally I would think that 10 PPM is a very quick scan, which it is, but it is more than half as fast as advertised.See Here: neatdesk

By: Neat Receipts Scanner

Neat Receipts Scanner — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:20:17 +0000

Good post but I think it is very much for NeatReceipts Scanner 500$.
Thanks.

By: electronic discovery

electronic discovery — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:49:31 +0000

I guess its fair enough to have a price of $500 bucks, specs and features are nice… so I might give it a try..

By: electronic discovery

electronic discovery — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:49:31 +0000

I guess its fair enough to have a price of $500 bucks, specs and features are nice… so I might give it a try..

By: Bruce

Bruce — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:26:05 +0000

The slots seem gimmicky. My Fujitsu ScanSnap S510 ($300 at Newegg) works fine with smaller stuff like business cards and index cards. The auto-processing could be nice, but not for a premium of $200. I process my stuff manually, and it's not a big deal.

By: Bruce

Bruce — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:26:05 +0000