<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Nikon D90 Is Extra Eye-Fi Friendly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/08/28/new-nikon-d90-is-extra-eye-fi-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/08/28/new-nikon-d90-is-extra-eye-fi-friendly/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PDFoxy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/08/28/new-nikon-d90-is-extra-eye-fi-friendly/comment-page-1/#comment-395399</link>
		<dc:creator>PDFoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=12733#comment-395399</guid>
		<description>The D90 has the same sensor (or greatly similar depending on the source) as the D300 which means it shares the same great ISO capabilities. 1600 looks fine and you can definitely get usable small prints from even 3200. There are some reviewers on other sites claiming that the D90 has better noise reduction than the D300.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D90 has the same sensor (or greatly similar depending on the source) as the D300 which means it shares the same great ISO capabilities. 1600 looks fine and you can definitely get usable small prints from even 3200. There are some reviewers on other sites claiming that the D90 has better noise reduction than the D300.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
