<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tricloptic TLR Camera Only Takes Bicloptic Pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bethany K Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-394274</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany K Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/#comment-394274</guid>
		<description>nice article! nice site. you&#039;re in my rss feed now ;-)&lt;br&gt;keep it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article! nice site. you&#39;re in my rss feed now <img src='http://www.ohgizmo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />keep it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-374839</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/#comment-374839</guid>
		<description>Oops... I just sort of associate &quot;SLR&quot; with &quot;not a point &#039;n shoot,&quot; you know? But I stand corrected. I&#039;ll fix the title.

@ Rick: that&#039;s certainly true. So you think that the current cost for a good new 80mm lens is due to the lack to demand and a specialized market? I guess in my experience, good glass is always expensive, new or used, but maybe not $1500 expensive for an 80mm prime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230; I just sort of associate &#8220;SLR&#8221; with &#8220;not a point &#8216;n shoot,&#8221; you know? But I stand corrected. I&#8217;ll fix the title.</p>
<p>@ Rick: that&#8217;s certainly true. So you think that the current cost for a good new 80mm lens is due to the lack to demand and a specialized market? I guess in my experience, good glass is always expensive, new or used, but maybe not $1500 expensive for an 80mm prime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Keir</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-374771</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/#comment-374771</guid>
		<description>Judging by the styling of the camera, with its cheerful but plastic &quot;3d World&quot; top, it&#039;s not going to be a $1500 camera, let alone a $4500 camera.

At the moment, new medium format SLR 80mm (i.e., &quot;normal&quot;) lenses cost $1500 because, at the moment, the only significant market for them is a high end, specialist market that wants to see names like &quot;Zeiss&quot; on the lense. 

But that doesn&#039;t mean they can&#039;t be made far more cheaply: in the heyday of the medium format twin lens reflex they were a common choice for vacation snapshots. Even Sears sold TLRs under the &quot;Tower&quot; brand name, and they were definitely not $1500 lenses on them. (Another comparision point: you can buy used 80mm medium format lenses in &quot;excellent&quot; condition from reputable dealers like KEH for under $100 these days.)

The 3rd lense that you use for focusing and sighting can be far cheaper, since the image will not be enlarged for printing. That means you don&#039;t need exotic glass, aspherical surfaces, and all the other tricks that push the price of &quot;taking&quot; lenses up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the styling of the camera, with its cheerful but plastic &#8220;3d World&#8221; top, it&#8217;s not going to be a $1500 camera, let alone a $4500 camera.</p>
<p>At the moment, new medium format SLR 80mm (i.e., &#8220;normal&#8221;) lenses cost $1500 because, at the moment, the only significant market for them is a high end, specialist market that wants to see names like &#8220;Zeiss&#8221; on the lense. </p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t mean they can&#8217;t be made far more cheaply: in the heyday of the medium format twin lens reflex they were a common choice for vacation snapshots. Even Sears sold TLRs under the &#8220;Tower&#8221; brand name, and they were definitely not $1500 lenses on them. (Another comparision point: you can buy used 80mm medium format lenses in &#8220;excellent&#8221; condition from reputable dealers like KEH for under $100 these days.)</p>
<p>The 3rd lense that you use for focusing and sighting can be far cheaper, since the image will not be enlarged for printing. That means you don&#8217;t need exotic glass, aspherical surfaces, and all the other tricks that push the price of &#8220;taking&#8221; lenses up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tastewar</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-374756</link>
		<dc:creator>tastewar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/#comment-374756</guid>
		<description>Geez, do you know what the S in SLR stands for? *Single,* dude! There used to be TLR&#039;s (twin lens reflex), and I guess this could be, too, if you substitute triple for twin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, do you know what the S in SLR stands for? *Single,* dude! There used to be TLR&#8217;s (twin lens reflex), and I guess this could be, too, if you substitute triple for twin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-374755</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/18/tricloptic-slr-camera-only-takes-bicloptic-pictures/#comment-374755</guid>
		<description>not to nitpick, but that&#039;s not an SLR (Single Lens Reflex).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to nitpick, but that&#8217;s not an SLR (Single Lens Reflex).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
