<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got MPx? Seitz 160 Megapixel Handheld Camera Is Still Not Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:10:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-361647</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/#comment-361647</guid>
		<description>Plus, it has an unfortunate goatse-esque design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, it has an unfortunate goatse-esque design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazal Majid</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-361514</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazal Majid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/21/got-mpx-seitz-160-megapixel-handheld-camera-is-still-not-enough/#comment-361514</guid>
		<description>Scanned slides from a Fuji 617 panoramic medium format camera similar to this one weigh in at 250 megapixels, not 100, and they don&#039;t have the shutter speed limitations or weird motion artifacts of a scanning back. Better Light makes much more affordable scanning backs for 4x5 large format cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scanned slides from a Fuji 617 panoramic medium format camera similar to this one weigh in at 250 megapixels, not 100, and they don&#8217;t have the shutter speed limitations or weird motion artifacts of a scanning back. Better Light makes much more affordable scanning backs for 4&#215;5 large format cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
