<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HyperDrive4 RAM HD Is Faster Than The Millennium Falcon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/comment-page-1/#comment-355695</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 06:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/#comment-355695</guid>
		<description>Blasphemy! Nothing is faster than the Falcon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blasphemy! Nothing is faster than the Falcon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manco</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/comment-page-1/#comment-355315</link>
		<dc:creator>Manco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/#comment-355315</guid>
		<description>DDR memory is many times faster than the SATA interface. Why should they use an even faster and much more expensive memory when the bottleneck is the interface?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DDR memory is many times faster than the SATA interface. Why should they use an even faster and much more expensive memory when the bottleneck is the interface?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kouroth</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/comment-page-1/#comment-353524</link>
		<dc:creator>Kouroth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/#comment-353524</guid>
		<description>Ah, a ram drive, finely. To bad it costs more than my computer cost. I&#039;ll wait a bit longer, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a ram drive, finely. To bad it costs more than my computer cost. I&#8217;ll wait a bit longer, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snelleeddy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/comment-page-1/#comment-353521</link>
		<dc:creator>Snelleeddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/18/hyperdrive4-ram-hd-is-faster-than-the-millennium-falcon/#comment-353521</guid>
		<description>why use DDR? DDR2 is faster and cheaper and DDR3 way faster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why use DDR? DDR2 is faster and cheaper and DDR3 way faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
