<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And There Was Much Rejoicing: Cell Phone Charger Standardization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:16:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sjef Peeraer</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/comment-page-1/#comment-392700</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjef Peeraer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-392700</guid>
		<description>In 2006 we have tried to get a standard for AC/DC chargers and adapter (&lt;15W) off the ground. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please see an outline of the concept (called &#039;UniCharge&#039;) here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unicharge.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UniCharge&lt;/a&gt; --&gt; vision document</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006 we have tried to get a standard for AC/DC chargers and adapter (&lt;15W) off the ground. </p>
<p>Please see an outline of the concept (called &#39;UniCharge&#39;) here: <a href="http://www.unicharge.org" rel="nofollow">UniCharge</a> &#8211;&gt; vision document</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sjef Peeraer</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/comment-page-1/#comment-389831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjef Peeraer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-389831</guid>
		<description>In 2006 we have tried to get a standard for AC/DC chargers and adapter (&lt;15W) off the ground. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please see an outline of the concept (called &#039;UniCharge&#039;) here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unicharge.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UniCharge&lt;/a&gt; --&gt; vision document</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006 we have tried to get a standard for AC/DC chargers and adapter (&lt;15W) off the ground. </p>
<p>Please see an outline of the concept (called &#39;UniCharge&#39;) here: <a href="http://www.unicharge.org" rel="nofollow">UniCharge</a> &#8211;&gt; vision document</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SImon</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/comment-page-1/#comment-343061</link>
		<dc:creator>SImon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-343061</guid>
		<description>About frickin&#039; time!  Micro-USBs are coming into more and more usage.  Case in point, my Bluetooth headphones and transmitter.  Besides, why adopt a chunky, older-generation USB port when they can go for the uber-sleek micro?  It is GOOD for business because it adopts the NEW standard, not the older ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About frickin&#8217; time!  Micro-USBs are coming into more and more usage.  Case in point, my Bluetooth headphones and transmitter.  Besides, why adopt a chunky, older-generation USB port when they can go for the uber-sleek micro?  It is GOOD for business because it adopts the NEW standard, not the older ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin K.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/comment-page-1/#comment-343015</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-343015</guid>
		<description>Of course they couldn&#039;t agree upon a pre-existing standard.  That&#039;s just bad for business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they couldn&#8217;t agree upon a pre-existing standard.  That&#8217;s just bad for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
