<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE Security Slimline KeySafe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hotbox</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/comment-page-1/#comment-313851</link>
		<dc:creator>Hotbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/#comment-313851</guid>
		<description>Hugo, you are incorrect. There is no 3 digit PIN limitation. The limitation is that you can use a number only once in your PIN. For example, you could use 1234567890 as your PIN, but not 1234567899. The downside to this type of lock is that it doesn&#039;t matter what order you type your PIN in. If it&#039;s set to 13579, then 97531 will unlock it, as would 15397, 39517 or 57391. Not very secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugo, you are incorrect. There is no 3 digit PIN limitation. The limitation is that you can use a number only once in your PIN. For example, you could use 1234567890 as your PIN, but not 1234567899. The downside to this type of lock is that it doesn&#8217;t matter what order you type your PIN in. If it&#8217;s set to 13579, then 97531 will unlock it, as would 15397, 39517 or 57391. Not very secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ste</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/comment-page-1/#comment-313697</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/#comment-313697</guid>
		<description>Iam i missing something here, these have been out for ages, when i was in florida on holiday about 5 years ago the villia we stayed in had one of these so no one had to meet us with the keys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iam i missing something here, these have been out for ages, when i was in florida on holiday about 5 years ago the villia we stayed in had one of these so no one had to meet us with the keys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/comment-page-1/#comment-313683</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/07/25/ge-security-slimline-keysafe/#comment-313683</guid>
		<description>The 1000 combinations limit should be because of a 3 digit pin limitation. 000 to 999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1000 combinations limit should be because of a 3 digit pin limitation. 000 to 999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
