<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: faceSCAN III &#8211; DIY 3D Portraits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/19/facescan-iii-diy-3d-portraits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/19/facescan-iii-diy-3d-portraits/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/19/facescan-iii-diy-3d-portraits/comment-page-1/#comment-140617</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/19/facescan-iii-diy-3d-portraits/#comment-140617</guid>
		<description>Not that impressive... Genex, A4 Vision, or the Trusty Minolta Vivid series all do similar things.  Frankly a 0.8 sec capture time is actually average to slow in the field, not fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that impressive&#8230; Genex, A4 Vision, or the Trusty Minolta Vivid series all do similar things.  Frankly a 0.8 sec capture time is actually average to slow in the field, not fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
