<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Top Tech: Cisco Tries To Stick It To Apple With Full-Page Ad In NYT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuffy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-132770</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/#comment-132770</guid>
		<description>iPod, iMac, iTunes, iLife...

At this point, i-anything is embedded in the public consciousness as an Apple product.  

To me, any company using the i-prefix name for what very clearly is not an Apple product  screams &quot;knockoff.&quot;  It doesn&#039;t matter if they actually own the name at this point--it just seems like coattail riding.

What&#039;s so great about the name iPhone that they&#039;d put up such a fuss about retaining the name anyway?  Unless they&#039;re doing this specifically to ensure that Apple is forced to purchase the name for an appropriate price, let it go.

That Linksys ad is awful-looking.  If it didn&#039;t say amazon.com on the bottom, I&#039;d almost think it was a Radio Shack ad from 16 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod, iMac, iTunes, iLife&#8230;</p>
<p>At this point, i-anything is embedded in the public consciousness as an Apple product.  </p>
<p>To me, any company using the i-prefix name for what very clearly is not an Apple product  screams &#8220;knockoff.&#8221;  It doesn&#8217;t matter if they actually own the name at this point&#8211;it just seems like coattail riding.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s so great about the name iPhone that they&#8217;d put up such a fuss about retaining the name anyway?  Unless they&#8217;re doing this specifically to ensure that Apple is forced to purchase the name for an appropriate price, let it go.</p>
<p>That Linksys ad is awful-looking.  If it didn&#8217;t say amazon.com on the bottom, I&#8217;d almost think it was a Radio Shack ad from 16 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-132421</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/#comment-132421</guid>
		<description>:( 
This article was good until the lewd reference at the end, gimme a break.
:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.ohgizmo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
This article was good until the lewd reference at the end, gimme a break.<br />
 <img src='http://www.ohgizmo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-132325</link>
		<dc:creator>LD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/05/todays-top-tech-cisco-tries-to-stick-it-to-apple-with-full-page-ad-in-nyt/#comment-132325</guid>
		<description>Cisco doesn&#039;t own Netgear, it owns Linksys.  And it bought Linksys in 2003, not 2000.  And iPhone was not acquired in that purchase.  It was a purchase of a different company.  That&#039;s only the first half of the first paragraph.  I stopped reading after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco doesn&#8217;t own Netgear, it owns Linksys.  And it bought Linksys in 2003, not 2000.  And iPhone was not acquired in that purchase.  It was a purchase of a different company.  That&#8217;s only the first half of the first paragraph.  I stopped reading after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

