<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision Reviewed.  Verdict: Phenomenal, Pricey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/01/06/logitech-quickcam-ultra-vision-reviewed-verdict-phenomenal-pricey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/01/06/logitech-quickcam-ultra-vision-reviewed-verdict-phenomenal-pricey/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:25:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devicepedia.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/01/06/logitech-quickcam-ultra-vision-reviewed-verdict-phenomenal-pricey/comment-page-1/#comment-114837</link>
		<dc:creator>Devicepedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/01/06/logitech-quickcam-ultra-vision-reviewed-verdict-phenomenal-pricey/#comment-114837</guid>
		<description>$130 is not that bad thinking that you get the quality of a glass lens

Wouldn&#039;t personally pay, but it&#039;s nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$130 is not that bad thinking that you get the quality of a glass lens</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t personally pay, but it&#8217;s nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
