<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supersonic Shape-Shifter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/06/25/supersonic-shape-shifter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/06/25/supersonic-shape-shifter/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Neidlinger</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/06/25/supersonic-shape-shifter/comment-page-1/#comment-21340</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Neidlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/06/25/supersonic-shape-shifter/#comment-21340</guid>
		<description>This is similar to a revived SST that the US was to build circa 1976.  The wings were eliptical, and it had a central pivot point.....sound familiar??  The body of the SST was typical 1970&#039;s style, almost Concorde like.  If I am not mistaken, DARPA had a role in that project as well.

Everything old is new again.........

AP Neidlinger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is similar to a revived SST that the US was to build circa 1976.  The wings were eliptical, and it had a central pivot point&#8230;..sound familiar??  The body of the SST was typical 1970&#8242;s style, almost Concorde like.  If I am not mistaken, DARPA had a role in that project as well.</p>
<p>Everything old is new again&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>AP Neidlinger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

