<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak Unveils Cheaper And Lighter &#8220;dSLR Alternative&#8221; Digicam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/</link>
	<description>Deliciously Geeky...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Beare</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/comment-page-1/#comment-48556</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Beare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=456#comment-48556</guid>
		<description>This camera is as close to professional as you are going to get. The colors are vivid and clean. Light weight and easy to operate. SLR and Digital together at its best.Not a disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera is as close to professional as you are going to get. The colors are vivid and clean. Light weight and easy to operate. SLR and Digital together at its best.Not a disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camera Blog &#187; Kodak P880 Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/comment-page-1/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera Blog &#187; Kodak P880 Digital Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=456#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>[...] will testify to the fact that optical zooming while filming video is a wonderful feature. 	Read more about the Kodak P880 Digital SLR   		Entry Filed under: Kodak                   	Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will testify to the fact that optical zooming while filming video is a wonderful feature. 	Read more about the Kodak P880 Digital SLR<br />
 		Entry Filed under: Kodak</p>
<p> 	Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=456#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note, you are absolutely right. Kodak is touting these as dSLR alternatives, I will chnage the title but I did mention dSLR Quality digicam in my post. Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, you are absolutely right. Kodak is touting these as dSLR alternatives, I will chnage the title but I did mention dSLR Quality digicam in my post. Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Herrner</title>
		<link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Herrner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=456#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t want to be picky, but there&#039;s nothing SLRish with that camera (apart from the looks) - no mirror, no SLR. It&#039;s that easy, i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t want to be picky, but there&#8217;s nothing SLRish with that camera (apart from the looks) &#8211; no mirror, no SLR. It&#8217;s that easy, i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

